The thinking mode of enterprise competition and the intellectual property system will cause antagonisms between countries in the world, and the world economic problems cannot be effectively solved
Although the thinking mode of protecting innovation is generally recognized in countries all over the world. However, intellectual property protection cannot meet the needs of new industrial technologies, and the protection is unreasonable. Intellectual property has become a hindrance to the development of the industry, causing many innovative companies to fail to achieve their expected goals in the market war, making many companies lose confidence in intellectual property protection.
Many intellectual property experts believe that there are three reasons for the failure to achieve the intended purpose:
One is that innovation protection is incomplete and insufficient. The business model cannot abandon the innovation of the group economy, and intellectual property cannot be protected.
The second is that the expectations of intellectual property rights are too high and want to use the fact that intellectual property rights are reversed and backward. The purpose of the intellectual property system is to protect innovation. The essence of intellectual property lies in operation. In market competition, intellectual property is only a tool of the market, only one of the non-essential resources for business operations, not the company’s ownership; therefore, as intellectual property People, what I want to say to market players is that we must criticize the omnipotent argument of intellectual property rights. Many companies and industries do not necessarily need intellectual property rights for innovation.
The third is that intellectual property is the legal system of various countries, not a regional legal system, let alone an international and consistent legal system. Nowadays, all countries in the world are an economic community, and a large-scale economic decline in any region will inevitably impact the world. Therefore, it is necessary to establish a regional intellectual property system and an international intellectual property system. Only when countries in the world treat innovation with a consistent standard can they not harm the development of innovative technologies. We suggest that a regional intellectual property system be established in CPTPP to replace the inconsistent intellectual property system of countries around the world. In particular, the standards for reviewing innovative technologies and judging infringement must be implemented in the regional intellectual property system. Establish a regional intellectual property system to replace national intellectual property systems. Many people hope that the regional intellectual property system can be implemented in 2024. Through the establishment of the Asian regional intellectual property system, they will try the feasibility of the regional intellectual property system.
On the basis of understanding the nature of intellectual property rights, a correct understanding of the value of intellectual property rights is particularly important for the healthy and sustainable development of enterprises. For enterprises that rely on innovation and development, the protection of innovation cannot be protected for the sake of protection. The ultimate goal is to gain profits from operations. However, in order to obtain profits from operations, think from the perspective of probability, and avoid many inconsistent institutional conflicts, innovative technologies can be implemented in various countries. Many technological innovators will not be restricted by large consortia to innovate and develop. After all, many large consortia apply for intellectual property rights, but are unwilling to enforce intellectual property rights, waiting for the opportunity to execute infringement lawsuits, hindering the world's innovation and development.
At present, countries around the world have the problem of insufficient chip supply, which is enough to cause economic decline in many industries, decline in national GDP, and international financial crises. However, chip technology is over-protected by intellectual property rights, resulting in intellectual property holders unwilling to assist related companies around the world to solve technical and production problems. They can only watch many industries stop working problems, which will cause international problems. Economic issues.
The impact of COVID-19 on the economies of all countries in the world must be resolved through cooperation among all countries in the world. Many chip-producing companies, although the technology is inferior to TSMC, but if TSMC is willing to help them develop their technology, these companies can also produce products just like TSMC. For example, if companies using automotive chips in various countries around the world are willing to cooperate with each other and temporarily abandon the issues of competition and intellectual property rights, the problem of COVID-19 impacting the economies of all countries in the world can be solved. Therefore, we suggest that countries around the world suspend the implementation of the intellectual property system from March 2021 to December 2025. At the same time, during this period of time, the feasibility of the regional intellectual property system was studied. In the face of global economic and industrial problems, countries in the world should replace competition with cooperation to avoid economic problems from impacting the economies of all countries.
If TSMC is unwilling to assist countries in the world to produce products like TSMC, it is recommended that semiconductor equipment manufacturers stop supplying semiconductor equipment to TSMC. The U.S. government and European governments must understand that intellectual property and corporate competition thinking mode will only cause economic problems in countries around the world. For many countries, based on the problems of national development and the survival of the people, they have abandoned the thinking mode of intellectual property and corporate competition, and have developed toward a way of seeking common interests through cooperation with each other. If American companies and European companies still abide by the thinking mode of intellectual property and corporate competition, it will become a key weakness, and it will be the key to weakness for the generation of virtual innovation, business model innovation, and mutual benefit. For example: Even if Taiwan TSMC is willing to help the United States solve the problem of automotive chips, are there any problems in other industries? Can Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. solve all problems? To avoid economic problems in countries around the world, TSMC should assist companies in various countries to develop products like TSMC. Countries in the world should stop the implementation of intellectual property rights in the next five years and develop a regional intellectual property system to jointly solve the problem of COVID-19 impacting the economies of all countries in the world.
International Investment Consulting Company Intellectual Property Investment Consulting
Chen Yu Yang